Comments on: How To Great Looking YouTube Videos – Best Upload Settings http://www.funtechtalk.com/how-to-great-looking-youtube-videos-best-upload-settings/ Fun Tech News And Info Thu, 06 Oct 2011 06:01:02 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: rolly faylon http://www.funtechtalk.com/how-to-great-looking-youtube-videos-best-upload-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-52289 rolly faylon Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:15:25 +0000 http://www.funtechtalk.com/how-to-great-looking-youtube-videos-best-upload-settings/#comment-52289 i want to upload my video i want to upload my video

]]> By: redclaymud http://www.funtechtalk.com/how-to-great-looking-youtube-videos-best-upload-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-19132 redclaymud Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:21:57 +0000 http://www.funtechtalk.com/how-to-great-looking-youtube-videos-best-upload-settings/#comment-19132 I have found that posting the highest quality video possible seems to produce the best results, and lately that's been in the Windows Movie Maker format (.wmv) with a broadband setting of 2 Mbps. The files are a bit smaller than 640x480 .avi, but it still takes forever to upload. Doubt I'm saving more than a minute or two. I bounce between using ShowBiz 2 and Windows Movie Maker. Both have their strong points. I think ShowBiz handles the 2-3 gb files better than Windows Movie Maker. I have found that posting the highest quality video possible seems to produce the best results, and lately that’s been in the Windows Movie Maker format (.wmv) with a broadband setting of 2 Mbps. The files are a bit smaller than 640×480 .avi, but it still takes forever to upload. Doubt I’m saving more than a minute or two.

I bounce between using ShowBiz 2 and Windows Movie Maker. Both have their strong points. I think ShowBiz handles the 2-3 gb files better than Windows Movie Maker.

]]>